Social Identity Theory Saq

The sit is a surmisal that establishes that a person has their pull in idiosyncraticity and a affable identity. By kind identity I mean the social chemical pigeonholing with which any(prenominal)one associates. in that respect are a few studies that support this theory from which Im going to describe 2 tajfels (1970), at the arrest of the think over it was shown that the boys chose to maximize their differences over group over maximize their profit. You can see that by doing this the kids headstrong to choose their group identity over their social identity. An some other study is Zimbardos prison study. This study shows how twain the prisoners and the guards take on the enumeration that has been assigned to them quickly move their previous identities. It also shows how the prisoners signalise with their in-group and rebel against them. This shows that people peoples carriage is not only soul but also from our social selves and this studies help me prove that we look at a social identity in addition to our individual one. In the turnaround just like any other theory thither are strengths and limitation.

The limitations of this theory are that The depend upon predicts that group trial will lead to reduced fellowship with the group, but this has been disproven this states thats this theory is not true interbreed culturally in collectivist cultures.. There is a study by subgenus Chen et al. (1998) that shows that students in USA evaluated the out-group more favorably if they succeeded and their in-group didnt. this was shown opposite to what Chinese students would do. Although SIT does accurately predict in-group favoritism (or lack of) i n individualist cultures, it does not always! do so in collectivist cultures.If you want to get a full essay, ordain it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.